Validate Your Life

Polemics, Plausible Progress, and Protuberant Projects

Wanna Be a Great Entrepreneur? Buy a Hat Rack!

The whole “work hours” thing is a foreign concept to me. Maybe because I just don’t make a distinction between work and play, or (most likely) I just always work.  Sometimes I wake up and start work at 2am. Sometimes I just don’t ever go to sleep and take a nap in the middle of the day.

It’s easier for me, I realize, to just say my sleep patterns (the times where I’m not working) than the times I am working;  I sometimes sleep around the 12ish to 3ish zone. I like exercising at night (moonlight runs).

So it’s strange, I work about 80-90 times harder and am more demanding of myself than I would have been if I worked for an employer other than myself.  This increase in work motivation, results, and demands is probably inherent to any freelance work or “business owner” work.  That’s an interesting pattern and managing the work that you do as an entrepreneur is what we’re talking about today. You have to develop this weird relationship with yourself where you’re the administrator who decides what we need to do (as a business) and then you put on the “employer cap” and do the stuff that you decided to do while wearing the administrative hat. Finally, you clean it all up by wearing, possibly a “customer hat” and test-running for the purposes of debugging your business feature.  This works with websites, products, services, expansions of any kind.

Having access to multiple outcome frames from multiple hats (points of view and angles) is a must for any entrepreneur. How do you do this? How do you don and even design the array of chapeaus you have to wear to be a successful entrepreneur? (more…)

, , , , ,
2009/06/20 at 4:25 PM Comments (3)

Flow Plan for Stock Options: Savviness Explained!

Buy Stock Option
Example:  July $50 call option for Walgreens is $1.66 (1.66/share, always in round lot, so $166)
July = Expiration Month (it’s always the 3rd friday of the month!)
$50 = strike price
When the Option Expires.  Decision Flow

(more…)

, , , , ,
2009/06/16 at 7:57 AM Comments (2)

Sharkwater FTW

Sure there’s a few rare incidents of them attacking humans

but the same is true of lightning

and lightning strikes are actually more frequent than shark bites.  If Spielberg had created Zappers instead of Jaws, about how frequently people get struck and killed by lightning would there be a greater fear irrational fear of the atmospheric discharge of electricity and indifference to our cartilaginous friends?  I think so.

Sharks are beautiful. (more…)

, ,
2009/06/14 at 7:07 AM Comments (0)

I Don’t Use Beds

One interesting fact about is me that I don’t sleep on beds.  Since 2003, I haven’t slept on a bed.  I started this practice while studying spider monkeys in the yucatan jungle of Mexico.  Obviously, we slept in tents in the yucatan and there were no mattress beds in the tents — just the refreshingly simple jungle floor.  I continued this.  Sleeping on the floor is better for:
My back.  Mattresses encourage odd vertebral curvature, the floor does not and my spine has been noticeably more aligned and even spinal elongation has occurred since I started this practice.
My energy.  I got groggy sleeping in beds, but I feel refreshed and clear sleeping on the floor.
My simplicity.   As part of my productivity and organizational coachign, I’m an anti-clutter freak and while it may seem overly-meticulous to focus on not having bedding clutter to worry about, having to make a bed, deal with undersheets, comforter, mattress sheets, versus just one blanket that I use to cover me while sleeping on the floor, greatly makes my life easier, simpler, and more clutter-free, when you add up all your belongings (and they do add up!).

(more…)

, , , ,
2009/06/13 at 3:58 AM Comments (0)

Comprehensive Success — The Three Categories of People Medicine!

Hear This In FULL as a free podcast! If you like what you hear. Be sure to check out the “Audio” page of http://www.validateyourlife.com for more inspiration and clarity!

People Categories

Categorize People in I’ve noticed those three distinctions VERY clearly in friends but instead of just categorizing appropriately the “friend” as a
(more…)

,
2009/06/11 at 9:15 AM Comments (27)

Purpose and Tools for Getting There

Purpose and Tools for Getting There
Defining Purpose and Tools to get there.  GREAT Lucid Ideas  
I asked myself what my purpose in life is.  I couldn’t figure it out.  So I asked, “Okay, what definitely IS NOT my purpose in life?”.  I thought about it and said, “to wear socks — my purpose on life is definitely NOT to wear socks.”  That’s great!! Why because that process of elimination helps define some crucial criteria for better solidifying and illuminating what I my purpose IS on the planet.  The logic behind “not here to wear socks” was because everyone can and does do it. Everyone wears socks, so my purpose couldn’t possibly be to wear socks because it’s not unique.  
Therefore, a key criteria for my purpose is that few people possess your aptitude and high-level skill in that purpose.  The purpose must be unique and of high-skill level so that very few (or maybe even no one) can do that purpose better than I.  If tons of people can do my “purpose” better than I can, then that isn’t a purpose, that’s a mere tool.  

(more…)

,
2009/06/08 at 6:40 PM Comment (1)

POPP…Into Getting Organized COMPLETELY.

A vision without a task is but a dream, a task without a vision is drudgery, a vision and a task is the hope of the world”

– Sussex, England Church (importance of vision).

Welcome to the Progress and Organizational Productivity Principles. Everyone’s system for organization their stuff is unique — and it should be unique.  Why? Because there exist 6.6 billion unique and different people in the world embodying individual personality characteristics, voices, choices, and beliefs!  Even twins are remarkably different with remarkably different goals and projects and todos and productivity items.  POPP is about openly developing your own style, your own method, for staying organized in a way that works, and is consistent, and endures even some of the most fast-paced action-packed times of your life!

Today we’re focusing on the essential 4 principles of the POPP

(more…)

, , , ,
2009/06/06 at 1:48 PM Comments (2)

Yeah…I’m Totally 100% I Followed Movies in order to Coach Actors

http://www.yahoo.com/s/1081179

Carradine’s death and Heath’s death in early 2008 (both suicides) shows that actors are unhappy. They need and are lost and confused. I’m 100% convinced that the reaons for following film and studying acting for a bit was to eventually Coach actors in areas of fulfilment and health and performance and meaning. It’s simple. Actor’s have a lot of money and little happiness. I have a lot of happiness and little money. I can teach the happiness; they can give me the money. Both parties happy. :D !!

This makes you realize that Hollywood is truly just a massive Cult of Marketing and ploys nad disillusionment tied in with the media to create the illusion of the “glory of fame and stardom” etc. Well Hollywood went down the tubes. Seriously. I’ve been living 20 miles west of “Hollywood” the past year and the place is like a vacant ghost town when I visit it (seriously). Additionally, the silver screen pictures and that whole era from a sales/business point of view is completely wasted and gone. Youtube, private casts, internet “films” are now reality. So the Cultu of Hollywood is slowly dying.

Boy has my thought evolved rapidly the past years!! Only three years ago I was fascinated with and enthralled by actors. Now, after discovering some truly clear thinking rocking bodacious people (DB, Dawkins, etc). I’ve realized, sure, some actors may be genuinely cool, great people, but their profession is the biggest kind of cult disillusionment mass hypnosis possible. Tahts’ why so many off themselves because their profession is so warped and disillusioned and they’re a servant for “product placement” in the films! They likely have very little sense of self after playing characters and roles for many years of their life.

Coaching is the opposite of that. I spend YEARS of my life writing books on discovering exactly what I want to know and who I want to be and I discover that! I was interested in spirituality and when I was, it was exciting but various things (prosetylizatio in Costa Rica on multiple occasion, reading up on cults and witnessing identical similarities between cults and major religions etc) emerged and I evolved out of that. Now science and atheism are rivetting. TRULY rivetting. But the truth of the matter is. They’ve ALWAYS been rivetting! I’ve ALWAYS been this nerdy, scientific atheist. I watch home videos of me as a kid and I see that and know that. “Devout Atheism” (:D) is what’s true for me. Kiekegaard says “I must find a truth that’s true for me”. Well, soren, I did just that and it’s refreshing and incredibly MASSIVELY empowering!! Wow. So empowering to honor my genuine LOVE for science! Three kinds of symbiotic relationships, Stomata on plants, cellular respiration I love that high-tech jargon and better yet the fact that it’s linked to real things in nature. But physics is like some of the most absolute truths of all tied in with the precision of math. I’m very interested in physics especially. Sweet!!

,
2009/06/04 at 5:05 PM Comments (0)

Schwarzenegger: Keep Our Beaches Open! Move Towards At Least Commensualistic Symbiosis

Dear Governor Schwarzenneger,

(From John Thomas “Kooz” Kuczmarski)

I’m a strong believer that the purpose of a city should serve Nature. Nature — wildlife, animals, we homo sapiens ARE Nature — should be the intention of anything municipal, or city-based. Therefore the idea of actually closing beaches, closing a way for humans to enjoy nature (the ocean and beaches) would be undermining the very purpose of a city.

Do you really think people will stand for not being able to access beaches? Have you any idea how ludicrous that sounds?

I think anyone who believes eliminating parks-nature-Beach funding for the purpose of redirecting those funds to something non-Nature-based needs to re-evaluate their mission, don’t you?

If the significance of Nature (the oxygen we breath from the botanical plants of parks) and the body of water that keeps us alive (planet earth ecologically could not survive if it were not for it being covered with over 70% water) is eclipsed, all is lost for EARTH and humans. This sounds extreme and that’s because it is. If anything, funding needs to be redirected to opening MORE beaches and parks to remind us homo sapiens that we are just highly-evolved primates, elements of nature and truly do deserve to connect with Nature readily and frequently.

I think one problem with American government is that it HAS too much funding!! IT has so much funding that it redirects it’s energies, finances, and time away from the absolute necessities (nature, oxygen, planetary perpetuation and survival).

(more…)

, , , ,
2009/06/03 at 11:03 AM Comments (0)
This blog is monetized using Are-PayPal WP Plugin This work is licensed by John Thomas "Kooz" Kuczmarski and Validate Your Life under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/.